Mountain View Coalition for Sustainable Planning
Follow us:
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Comment Letters
  • Calendar
  • Our Work
  • Get Involved
  • Contact Us
  • For MVCSP Members
  • City of Mountain View City Council Agendas & Future Agenda Items
  • City of Mountain View Planning Division Update
  • City of Mountain View Capital Improvement Program
  • City of Mountain View Zoning Map
  • City of Mountain View City Budget
  • City of Mountain View External Roster
  • City of Mountain View Advisory Body Work Plans
  • Safe Parking Community Task Force

A second summary of the 4/26 meeting on San Antonio Center

4/29/2011

0 Comments

 
Mountain View City Council Meeting Summary

4/26

Item 5.1 San Antonio Center

            The atmosphere was tense as the developer expressed their desire to start construction immediately; they clearly wanted the project approved as designed. However, even before the developer’s presentation and public comment, council was apprehensive to approve the project and several members stated they had concerns about the design and affordable housing units on site.

            When the developer presented their project to Council, there were several surprising changes to their project proposal. First, the developer stated they would be subsidizing transit passes for the employees of the tenants on the site. Second, they agreed to dedicate 3% of the total residential units on site as affordable units. Third, they said the Rite Aid was now out of the project, and the building edge was now moved to the street, but entrances were still facing away from El Camino. Finally, the developer offered to dedicate the Hetch Hetchy park space as public space, but through some sort of agreement, the developer would pay the maintenance costs associated with the park space.

            After the developer outlined the list of new civic benefits, they turned to proposals made by staff that they felt should not be required to implement. For example, they felt requiring solar powered water heaters was inappropriate and should be scratched. They listed many other items they disagreed with, but council was baffled by their request to approve the project anyway since some this list of changes was alien to some councilmembers. Because of the many last minute changes, council decided not to vote on the precise plan amendments, EIR, or project proposal but instead review the proposed design of the project and give their recommendations to staff. Staff would then implement the changes and the project would come back to council at a later date.

            After this, the meeting took on a form resembling a study session. Public comments began. A variety of points of view were expressed. Workers from Safeway corporate and retail were present to express their support for the new Safeway design along with the new jobs the store would require. Several speakers expressed doubt over transforming El Camino to a more people friendly space and felt the project should be passed as-is. Doug DeLong and another person commented on the need for a greater number of affordable units on site.

            When public comment closed, council commentary started with Tom Means. He felt it the developer knew their market best and should be allowed to build what they think will work on the site. He was skeptical of the grand boulevard initiative features including wide sidewalks, and storefronts facing the street. He felt stores with two entrances were vulnerable to crime and made the space difficult to lease. However, he did request for a more refined bike treatment from Fayette Dr. to the greenway bike path. He suggested a special signal phase for bicyclists to comfortably cross the street.

            Laura Macias was next, and she echoed Means’ call for the special cyclist signal phase. However, she went one step further and specifically asked for a dedicated bike signal. For the grand boulevard features, she didn’t explicitly call for storefronts on the street, but she asked for wider sidewalks and the landscape buffer to go between the sidewalk and the street, rather than between the buildings and the sidewalk. Additionally she specifically asked for the corner of El Camino and San Antonio to be tightened to slow car traffic down.

            Mike Kasperzak echoed the sidewalk comments and suggested that they should be wider than staff’s proposed 10’. He debated the merits of providing storefronts on both sides of the buildings, but he believed it was possible and directed staff to find a workable solution. Kasperzak definitely supported at least 10 percent of the total units to be BMR units. The city attorney said that, due to the palmer decision, the only way to achieve this was to enter into a development agreement with the applicant.

            Ronit and Margaret held similar positions on BMR units and the design of the project. They both suggested a 15’ sidewalk for the El Camino Frontage and expressed support of the characteristics of the Grand Boulevard Initiative. They both challenged the assertion that El Camino was a lifeless corridor, condemned to the exclusive use of automobiles.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Action Minutes
    Affordable Housing
    Agenda
    Bicycling
    B/PAC
    Bus Rapid Transit
    Caltrain
    Capital Improvement Projects
    CCE
    City Council
    City Council Goals
    City Of Mountain View
    Climate Action Plan
    Climate Collaborative
    Comment Letters
    Community Development
    Community Gardens
    Complete Streets
    Conservation
    Council Environmental Sustainability Committee
    Council Transportation Committee
    CSP Retreats
    Drive Less Challenge
    Drive Thrus
    Ecodistricts
    El Camino Real
    Elected Officials
    Elections
    Electric Vehicles
    Endorsements
    Energy
    Energy Upgrade Mountain View
    Environmental Impact Reports
    Environmental Planning Commission
    Environmental Sustainability
    Events
    Friends Of Caltrain
    Friends Of Stevens Creek Trail
    General Plan
    Grand Boulevard Initiative
    Great Ideas
    Great Streets Rengstorff Park
    Green Action
    Green Building
    Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program
    Health
    High Speed Rail
    Historical Resources
    Homeless
    Home Retrofits
    Housing
    Housing Impact Fees
    Jobs
    Livable Communities Forum
    Minimum Wage
    Mixed Use Development
    Monthly Meeting
    North Bayshore
    North Whisman
    Palo Alto
    Parking
    Parks
    Parks And Recreation Commission
    Pedestrian Issues
    Pedestrian Master Plan
    Plan Bay Area
    Planning Division
    Planning For Change
    Precise Plans
    Preservation
    Public Transportation
    Rental Housing Committee
    Resources
    Safe Parking
    San Antonio
    San Jose
    Santa Clara
    Schools
    Senior Advisory Committee
    SFPUC
    Silicon Valley Leadership Group
    Social Networking
    Soil & Water
    Staff Reports
    Sunnyvale
    Talking Points
    Technology
    Trails
    Transportation
    Trees
    Urban Gardens
    Vision Zero
    Volunteers Needed
    Water
    Workshop
    World Centric
    Youth Advisory Committee
    ZA Hearings

    Archives

    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    RSS Feed

Services

Service One
Service Two
Service Three

Company

About
The Company
Menu

Support

Contact
FAQ
Terms of Use
© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.