Mountain View Coalition for Sustainable Planning
Follow us:
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Comment Letters
  • Calendar
  • Our Work
  • Get Involved
  • Contact Us
  • For MVCSP Members
  • City of Mountain View City Council Agendas & Future Agenda Items
  • City of Mountain View Planning Division Update
  • City of Mountain View Capital Improvement Program
  • City of Mountain View Zoning Map
  • City of Mountain View City Budget
  • City of Mountain View External Roster
  • City of Mountain View Advisory Body Work Plans
  • Safe Parking Community Task Force

About Our June 2012 Meeting

5/28/2012

0 Comments

 
- Shoreline Shell carwash and expansion status and update (Guests: Ann McLaughlin and Joyce England, Shoreline West Association of Neighbors)
- Mountain View heritage trees policy (guest: Shani Kleinhaus, Audubon Society, Palo Alto)
- San Antonio Center status and update
- Bus Rapid Transit status and update
- Mountain View Citizen's Guide status and update
- Drive Through policy status and update
- Castro Street bike racks status and update
- Round-the-table closing comments
= Pearson House status
= Need new venue for meetings, as Vox is moving to Palo Alto

0 Comments

The EPC shows how to get bizniss done (even at 12:45am)

5/17/2012

1 Comment

 
Picture
At the end of a six hour meeting, the EPC decided in a 4-3 straw vote to go against Council's direction and revisit the idea of allowing housing in the North Bayshore neighborhood, through the policies in the General Plan. This was not a decision to be taken lightly; allowing housing in North Bayshore brings up a lot of unknowns and even potential drawbacks for things like wildlife. But MVCSP firmly believes that last night's decision was a sounds one for environmental, economic and community creating reasons. We look forward to navigating the complex but exciting challenges that this decision will open up.

The members of the EPC deserve a huge thank you for considering this matter long and hard. That thanks is extended to all members of the EPC regardless of where they fell on the decision. An extra special thanks to the four EPC members who decided in the end to express support for mixed use development in North Bayshore: Rachel Grossman, Chris Clark, Eric Anderson and EPC Chair Todd Fernandez. An extra special thanks goes to Rachel Grossman for leading the charge on this topic (we admire your boldness and conviction!), Todd Fernandez, for being brave enough to publically change his mind on a heated topic (that really does take humility, intelligence and confidence) and Chris Clark for making a hard decision with an election ahead of him (that's brave too!). Eric don't feel left out; thanks for being you. :)

Finally, a huge thanks to all of the advocates who turned out last night, especially the crazies that stuck around until almost 1:00am to make a public comment.  Thanks to those who wrote letters to your representatives. We've said it before but big milestones call for sappy repetition; it's people like you all who put the time in and speak up that make change happen. Thank you! You are our heroes!

- The Core Team
1 Comment

What is MVCSP asking for at the 5/16 EPC meeting (aka talking points)

5/15/2012

1 Comment

 
Overall Comments on the General Plan
  • Great job EPC (and staff and Council)! Through this process, MV officials and staff have thought creatively and with an eye toward toward our economic and environmental future, all while respecting the desires of the current community. We believe this General Plan will protect the things that we love about our city but give us the flexibility to grow and change in the right ways. Our city has the best officials and staff around!
Talking Points on Flexibility in the Focus Areas

  • MVCSP fully supports Council's suggestion that increased heights and densities be allowed when developers offer significant community benefits. Some examples of community benefits we think would warrant increased densities include:
  1. Park space
  2. Affordable housing
  3. Shuttles or other kinds of transit amenities
  • Similarly, MVCSP would like to see developers who build near transit and offer their tenants permanent, free transit passes be granted a parking requirement reduction.
  • As we have noted before, we encourage the EPC and Council to fold as many pieces of the Increased Housing Alternative that was studied into the EIR, into the Preferred Draft of the General Plan. This will allow the City to enjoy reduced the "vehicle miles traveled" rates that come when greater numbers of people live in close proximity to transit.
  1. One way to do this without triggering a new Environmental Impact Report and going beyond the level of intensity that the community is comfortable with right now, is simply by stating that allowing housing at heights and densities beyond what is in the general plan may be a way to mitigate for traffic and other impacts at a future date.



Talking Points on North Bayshore
  • We’d like to go on the record as saying that we still believe that North Bayshore can and should be a mixed use community in the future. More and more office parks are going to be going in this direction. We should take advantage of the General Plan update and move toward creating a model, mixed use employment center. We believe this could:
  1. Help reduce traffic.
  2. Create a neighborhood full of innovative people where ideas can incubate and flourish.
  3. Put MV at the cutting edge of a burgeoning movement toward the revamping of traditional office parks. This will help MV stay at the forefront of innovation, which is good for our local economy.
  4. Help support local business who need a customer base beyond 9am-5pm.
  • Please put policies in the General Plan that recognize that housing as a variable when studying mitigations to traffic and other challenges, when developing the precise and transportation plan.
  • Whether N. Bayshore remains office or becomes mixed use, transfer of development rights should be used to move development away from Shoreline Park and near the intersection of Shoreline and Charleston. This will do two things:
  1. Create a greater and much needed buffer for wildlife, and
  2. Create more of a neighborhood, which will make the neighborhood more pleasant for people, more walkable, which will reduce the need for driving and it will increase the likelihood that transit can be successfully run to and from the neighborhood. This is very important.
  • Please figure out how to permanently protect Shoreline Park. This may require two things:
  1. Change the zoning designation of the park from “Public Use”
  2. Plan for ample parks in N. Bayshore, some of which can be flagged as long term “reserves” of land, should there be a need for a school, fire station, etc.

 

 

1 Comment

Can't attend a meeting? Email your local officials.

5/14/2012

0 Comments

 
Members of City Council:

johninks@sbcglobal.net
la.macias@mountainview.gov
ronit.bryant@mountainview.gov
tom.means@mountainview.gov

jacsharonsiegel@comcast.net
mkasperzak@mediates.com 
Margaret.abekoga@mountainview.gov

Environmental Planning Commissioners:

trf@mac.com
lisa.matichak@gmail.com

ktrontell@mac.com

eanderson@csaengineering.com
clarkcr@gmail.com
grossmanrachel01@gmail.com
jrm7357@pacbell.net

It's always a good idea to cc relevant City staff on your emails. If you don't know the specific staff person working on your project, send it to the City Manager and City Clerk. If the project is related to land use/planning include Randy Tsuda and Martin Alkire. You may also want to include Ellis Berns, the Economic Development Director. Their emails are also below:

city.clerk@mountainview.gov

city.mgr@mountainview.gov
Martin.Alkire@mountainview.gov
randal.tsuda@mountainview.gov
ellis.berns@mountainview.gov
0 Comments

Upcoming meetings of importance regarding the General Plan

5/14/2012

0 Comments

 
  • May 16th - The EPC takes a straw vote on key pieces of the General Plan. Coincidentally, the EPC will also have study session on Phase II of the San Antonio Shopping Center redevelopment proposal put forward by Merlone Geier.
  • May 19 - The City will hold a town hall style meeting for the public on the General Plan. Public comments will be solicited.
  • May 30 - The EPC will review specific chapters of the General Plan. Exactly which chapters will be discussed on which date is not yet known.
  • June 6 - Same as above.
  • June 20 - Same as above.
  • June 27 - The EPC will have their final meeting to formally consider the General Plan before sending it off to City Council for review.
  • July 3 - Council study session on the General Plan
  • July 10 - Final meeting on the General Plan. Council adopts a new General Plan!!!
0 Comments

Meeting tomorrow, May 10th 6:30-8:30pm

5/9/2012

0 Comments

 
Tomorrow night, May 10th, MVCSP will be holding its monthly meeting at Vox Design Group's office at 421 Castro Street in Mountain View. We will be discussing the following items:

  • What advocacy steps to take in advance of the May 16th EPC meeting and the May 19th community meeting on the General Plan.
  • How should we handle Council's decision to not allow mixed use development at North Bayshore? (Google staff may be in attendance to share their plans on the matter.)
  • Preliminary plans for the San Antonio area have been released. How do they look? We may be joined by a San Antonio Shopping Center property owner who can offer his perspective and hear our thoughts.
  • Update on Bus Rapid Transit.
  • Report back on recent events we've hosted; workshops and Grand Boulevard Initiative.
  • Sharing the first draft of the MV Guide to Citizens' Involvement
  • Update on drivethrus

Please join us! Feel free to bring snack. :)





0 Comments

Notes from the May 2nd EPC meeting

5/9/2012

0 Comments

 
Below are notes taken from a few different MVCSP members at the MAy 2nd MVCSP meetings. Please note that while the account below has been assembled with the best of intentions, these are not official minutes of any kind and may have some mistakes. These notes focus on the two areas that are of primary interest to MVCSP; North Bayshore and the concept of increased flexibility in the General Plan. For more comprehensive minutes please refer to the City's minutes of the May 2nd meeting, which will be released on Friday, May 11.

No voting took place at the 5/2 EPC meeting. The meeting was primarily spent discussing the Council’s recent direction on the General Plan. Council’s decision to allow greater flexibility in the focus areas when developers provided community benefits, and council’s decision to nix mixed use development in the North Bayshore neighborhood were the two main topics of conversation.

Eric Anderson was not there.

North Bayshore

Rachel Grossman was very expressed great disappointment over Council’s decision about no residential development at North Bayshore. She made the point that Council has concerns about traffic on Shoreline and yet is unwilling or interested in one of the things that could present a solution to this problem; putting homes close to jobs.

Chris Clark - also expressed disappointment about North Bayshore.

Kathy Trontell – Kathy felt that there had been general, city-wide support for a vision of North Bayshore with housing. Everyone, including the Council seemed to be willing to work toward this vision but then somewhere along the way, something broke down and the Council lost the will to realize this vision. Kathy seemed to see this as a missed opportunity and failure to make something happen. She seemed disappointed but also resigned to the finality of the decision.

Todd Fernandez – Todd also seemed resigned to the finality of the decision. He expressed some disappointment over the decision but he also indicated that he shared some of Council’s reservations.

Lisa M. & John M. were very vocally opposed to housing in N. Bayshore.

Flexibility in the Focus Areas of the General Plan

The flexibility concept had general support from the majority of the EPC. There was no vote on the topic but multiple members of the EPC expressed support for the idea, especially as applied to the the San Antonio Center and El Camino Real. They asked staff to clarify exactly what this would mean for the zoning code.

To state the flexibility concept in another way; the direction that the EPC received from Council regarded flexibility on El Camino Real said that any proposed projects with a FAR between 1.85 FAR – 3 FAR is eligible for density bonuses, if the project is in a key location and the developer offers the community significant amenities (i.e. open space, affordable housing). This basically puts a policy in the General Plan that says future, conscientious variances are acceptable.

0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    Action Minutes
    Affordable Housing
    Agenda
    Bicycling
    B/PAC
    Bus Rapid Transit
    Caltrain
    Capital Improvement Projects
    CCE
    City Council
    City Council Goals
    City Of Mountain View
    Climate Action Plan
    Climate Collaborative
    Comment Letters
    Community Development
    Community Gardens
    Complete Streets
    Conservation
    Council Environmental Sustainability Committee
    Council Transportation Committee
    CSP Retreats
    Drive Less Challenge
    Drive Thrus
    Ecodistricts
    El Camino Real
    Elected Officials
    Elections
    Electric Vehicles
    Endorsements
    Energy
    Energy Upgrade Mountain View
    Environmental Impact Reports
    Environmental Planning Commission
    Environmental Sustainability
    Events
    Friends Of Caltrain
    Friends Of Stevens Creek Trail
    General Plan
    Grand Boulevard Initiative
    Great Ideas
    Great Streets Rengstorff Park
    Green Action
    Green Building
    Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program
    Health
    High Speed Rail
    Historical Resources
    Homeless
    Home Retrofits
    Housing
    Housing Impact Fees
    Jobs
    Livable Communities Forum
    Minimum Wage
    Mixed Use Development
    Monthly Meeting
    North Bayshore
    North Whisman
    Palo Alto
    Parking
    Parks
    Parks And Recreation Commission
    Pedestrian Issues
    Pedestrian Master Plan
    Plan Bay Area
    Planning Division
    Planning For Change
    Precise Plans
    Preservation
    Public Transportation
    Rental Housing Committee
    Resources
    Safe Parking
    San Antonio
    San Jose
    Santa Clara
    Schools
    Senior Advisory Committee
    SFPUC
    Silicon Valley Leadership Group
    Social Networking
    Soil & Water
    Staff Reports
    Sunnyvale
    Talking Points
    Technology
    Trails
    Transportation
    Trees
    Urban Gardens
    Vision Zero
    Volunteers Needed
    Water
    Workshop
    World Centric
    Youth Advisory Committee
    ZA Hearings

    Archives

    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    RSS Feed

Services

Service One
Service Two
Service Three

Company

About
The Company
Menu

Support

Contact
FAQ
Terms of Use
© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.